The experts know how to get rid of all any possible lingering issue that might cause potential problems. An expert, for example, can help get rid of problems such as odors that might be in the carpets and other areas of the home. They will have the apartment in totally perfect shape with all traces of such issues removed and ready to get on with the rest of their lives. All involved benefit from having someone work with them to get rid of any possible pet issues in a rental. Generating extra cash is a good idea. Many people can certainly use some extra funds in their lives.
These are extra monies that can be used for all sorts of things. One really great way to generate some extra money for anyone is with the help of renting out a space in the home for those who might be in need of any kind of temporary lodgings. Many people love visiting Sydney. They appreciate the many sights offered in a world class city.
Those who live here will find many takers for any kind of rental they have in mind. It all starts with the right preparation. Home cleaning Sydney is the first step. This lets the person begins to list the site on sites that are designed to bring in new renters. A renter can easily scan through many listings in order to find the one they like. Those who can demonstrate they have a home that has proper home cleaning Sydney are those who are likely to have lots of happy tenants are who are interested in the home space they have for rent.
Using home cleaning Sydney services let people take full advantage of this process to present the best possible and most delightful photographs of their beautiful home rental space. Anyone who is planning to list their room or home with this service will want to have ratings from their clients that are really good. Really good ratings help bring in more traffic, more views and another round of people who are happy to tell others how much they enjoyed renting the space.
Making use of whizz. Using home cleaning Sydney before the guests arrive at the space means that the owner has taken care of the space and cares deeply about client happiness. Welcoming guests into any home means that each guest should feel cared for by the owner. The services used in home cleaning Sydney also make it easy for people to clean out the space once someone has left.
A fast cleaning in between guests means that each person can be assured of having spaces that are designed for guest comfort in every way. They can can take pride in the spaces they present to others and enjoy how much it looks good when their guests are present. For an ultra-affordable cost, anyone who resides in the breathtaking city can have their house, apartment, or other type of home cleaned. Home cleaning Melbourne services are affordable and cost-effective. Sparkling homes need not cost an arm and a leg, and for a surprisingly affordable fee, anyone and everyone can enjoy expert cleaning assistance.
Being a bustling, energetic, and quick-moving city, Melbourne serves as bastion of competition—that is, it serves as the site upon which only the very best businesses and professional can thrive. Thanks to the convenience and efficiency of the home cleaning Melbourne boasts, clients need not spend the entire day at home in an effort to monitor progress. The bottom line is that the time is now to benefit from the home cleaning Melbourne boasts like Whizz.
The cost is minimal, the rewards are excellent, and the convenience associated with the process cannot be understated. Less time spent cleaning the home means that clients will have more time to work, socialize, relax, have fun, and explore the magic and excitement of Melbourne. Religion is the tragedy of mankind. It appeals to all that is noblest, purest, loftiest in the human spirit, and yet there scarcely exists a religion which has not been responsible for wars, tyrannies and the suppression of the truth. Religion is not kind, it is cruel. Wilson1 Love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven.
Jesus of Nazareth2. Summary The resurgence of religious violence at the start of the twenty-first century has reinforced the myth of secular tolerance — the notion that whereas religious believers are instinctively intolerant, tolerance comes naturally to the secular mind. This paper challenges the myth. It suggests that secular people are not immune from the temptation to persecute and vilify others, and argues that the Christian Gospel fostered the rise of religious toleration.
Do not be surprised if they are used. The horrible history of Christianity shows that whenever religion grabs temporal power it turns lethal. Those who believe theirs is the only way, truth and light will kill to create their heavens on earth if they get the chance. Secular commentators felt the need to vent their frustration at the religious zeal which had apparently motivated the suicide bombers.
They were, however, anxious to avoid charges of Islamophobia. Attacking Islam was taboo, but attacking religion per se was acceptable.
Underlying the polemics of Dawkins, Toynbee and Parris was what we might discourse in modern societies, for he combined a commitment to tolerance with an equally strong commitment to free and aggressive speech. He was surprisingly mealy-mouthed about the Roman persecution of the early Christians and the Japanese persecution of sixteenth-century Catholics — he seemed to favour worldly pagan persecutors over devout Christian martyrs.
As the historian Richard Popkin has pointed out, the basically tolerant deism of the American Revolution stood in sharp contrast to the intolerant deism of the French Revolution. Several thousand clergy were executed, and many more were imprisoned. Even nuns were sent to the guillotine. In this respect, the French Revolution established an ominous precedent.
For among the greatest figures in the secular rationalist tradition was Karl Marx. The Russian Revolution ushered in a period of repression and martyrdom almost unprecedented in its scale. By , not a single monastery or convent remained open out of a thousand or more with which the Soviet period began. The number of churches was reduced to barely a hundred, and thousands of clergy were arrested and liquidated.
Authors - Colin Feltham
Yet the mass murders of the 20th century were not perpetrated by some latter-day version of the Spanish Inquisition. They were done by atheist regimes in the service of Enlightenment ideas of progress. Stalin and Mao were not believers in original sin. Even Hitler, who despised Enlightenment values of equality and freedom, shared the Enlightenment faith that a new world could be created by human will.
Each of these tyrants imagined that the human condition could be transformed through the use of science. McLellan, Oxford University Press, , pp. McManners, ed. Craig, ed. The myth is not that secular people can be tolerant, for often they are. Rather, the myth of secular tolerance is that tolerance comes naturally to the secular person, whilst intolerance comes naturally to the religious believer. This is a myth in the vulgar sense that it is a commonly held belief without solid foundation, a figment; but it is also a myth in the technical sense — a moral tale that sustains and nourishes the culture and beliefs of those who hold it.
Before assessing the myth, we should begin with a definition. By contrast, intolerance involves the active attempt to suppress or silence the disapproved practice or belief. Of course, the means of suppression will vary greatly from context to context: a state may criminalise an activity and imprison or even execute those who practise it; a voluntary organisation may expel an offender from membership; and polemicists may attempt to discredit or destroy an opposing viewpoint by subjecting it to vilification and abuse.
In this paper, we will concentrate on political intolerance the use of state coercion , and polemical intolerance the use of vitriol and stereotyping. In the first part of the paper, I will question the myth of secular tolerance by arguing that secularists have often resorted to political and polemical intolerance. In the second half, I will suggest that the modern commitment to religious tolerance first emerged from within the Christian tradition.
The reality of secular intolerance The roots of modern secularism are complex, but it is possible to identify a continuous tradition of secular rationalist thought stemming from the radical Enlightenment of the eighteenth century. The Enlightenment was a complex phenomenon, and in many places it had a distinctly Christian complexion. But radical Enlightenment thinkers were fiercely anti-clerical and antagonistic to the claims of revealed religion.
Some of these men were deists, whilst others were atheists. But all emphatically rejected Christian claims to special divine revelation, and championed a sceptical and anti-supernaturalist worldview. The founding fathers of this radical Enlightenment believed that their movement would form a steadily expanding oasis of secular tolerance in a desert of religious bigotry. Voltaire was convinced that rationalism would rescue Europe from the violence of the Christian past and propel it towards a tolerant future. He himself campaigned against the persecution of French Huguenots, and other deists like Thomas Jefferson and Frederick the Great of Prussia made major contributions to religious toleration.
However, it would be a mistake to think that deists, atheists and freethinkers have always been on the side of the angels not that they believed in angels. Despite his impassioned pleas for toleration, Voltaire demonstrated little sympathy for traditional religions.
A brilliant satirist, he was scathing in his attacks on Jews, Catholics and Calvinists, whose cherished beliefs he scornfully dismissed as absurdities. In this respect, Voltaire established a model for 2 Here then is a serious problem for those who subscribe to the myth of secular tolerance. There is merit to this argument, as there is to the parallel claim that the Crusades and Inquisitions involved an ideological distortion of authentic Christianity. But there may also be distinctive features of the secularist worldview which foster intolerance.
The secular myth of progress tends to create a triumphalist and intolerant eschatology. People who believe that the future is secular, and that only backward religions stand in the way of progress, face a strong temptation to give history a helping hand by aggressively clearing these roadblocks from the highway to human emancipation. In the radical Enlightenment tradition, contempt for religion has frequently been translated into policies of suppression. Dawkins and Toynbee, of course, clearly stand in the line of Voltaire rather than of Lenin and Mao.
Although they disagree with what believers say, they would one hopes be willing to defend to the death their right to say it. On one level, such fighting talk is harmless. Sticks and stones may break bones, but words do not. Yet one wonders whether modern commentators have not crossed the boundary-line between legitimate vigorous critique and the crude stereotyping which is the hallmark of polemical intolerance. Casting off polemical restraint, they foster prejudice and undermine the possibility of genuine conversation. The worlds of education and politics should be religion-free zones.
Rather than protecting legitimate diversity, it undermines it. Christianity and the rise of toleration What then of the second component of the myth, the claim that intolerance comes naturally to the religious believer? This is clearly a central conviction of Dawkins, Toynbee and Parris, and many secular people are convinced that the very idea of tolerance is a product of Enlightenment rationalism.
During the Salman Rushdie controversy, the former Labour party leader, Michael Foot, put it this way: How the world in general, and Western Europe in particular, escaped from this predicament, this seemingly endless confrontation [between religions], is one of the real miracles of western civilisation, and it was certainly not the work of the fundamentalists on either side.
It is certainly true that in medieval and early modern Europe, devout Christians — like Thomas More and John Calvin — often supported policies of persecution. In reality, the early advocates of religious toleration in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Europe were devout Christians, and their case against persecution was fundamentally theological. The Gospel, they argued, reveals that we are all recipients of divine tolerance. Instead of treating us as our sins deserve, he endures our hostility and offers us forgiveness.
Like the Father of the Prodigal, he longs for the day when we will return to his embrace. Christ comes to inaugurate a new kind of kingdom, one not characterised by domineering rule or violence. Selling a home is a huge decision. People may take lots of time to think about how best to sell their homes. Part of preparing any home for sale to the public is having a home that looks great. At the same time, living in a home may mean that people are getting lots of dirt in the home.
It can be really hard to keep the home as clean as possible and show it at the same time. One of the best ways to combat this issue is with help from those who how to get home cleaning Brisbane done and keep the home cleaning Brisbane done as often as possible as the home continues to be shown to people.
Before the home spends a single second being shown to the public, it must be subject to house cleaning Brisbane. The process of home cleaning Brisbane is something that requires a great deal of attention to detail in every single way. The person needs to have expert help with this process. An outside source can provide that home cleaning Brisbane and get it done quickly. They will come to the home and help the homeowner decide what they need to do before they are going to have people in their homes to see if this is the home they want to buy.
The house cleaning Brisbane experts allow people to see what the home looks like through the eyes of others before they put it on the market for sale to the general public. Once the home is for sale, many people can expect to have lots of people coming to see it. A home that is on the market for the first time in many years may have several dozens of people coming to see it in a given day and even more on the weekends. Each person needs to make sure the home looks great. The use of house cleaning Brisbane makes that possible, allowing people to keep the home up in order to show it well.
A home that has the right amount of house cleaning Brisbane is one that is likely to see lots of visitors and then also likely to have people who are willing to buy it. When people keep that home clean even after showing it to the public for a long time, this indicates to buyers that the person really cares about keeping the home in good shape.
A home that looks good and is obviously cared for by the owners is one that makes it clear to the buying public that it is in good shape. They appreciate a home that looks very clean and bright. A home where all is totally clean is an indication that the home is very much a place where they might want to live.
This is why home cleaning of this kind can lead to a god home sale. Over the years this site has gone through many changes, and the often contentious debates between believers and unbelievers, which was once a site hallmark, have long since disappeared. Instead, the material has slowly and gradually moved in a more scholarly direction. Perhaps, this trend has been parallel to the journey my own life has taken over the past six or seven years. I can say that without boasting because the overwhelming quantity of things found here were not written by me.
Most are written by professors and scholars that are specialist in the various areas this site lists under its topics. There are plenty of sites already on the internet that cater to this need. Some people may wonder why a Christian would post material hostile to the Christian faith. I have two primary reasons. At the time, I was an atheist.
The thing that I have never forgotten, however, and which still remains vivid in my mind, was a poster I had on the back of my bathroom door. Some years later when I became a Christian, I started out as a very liberal one — reading books mixing Christianity with Buddhism and the like. Over the years, and with much reading, I gradually moved in a conservative direction. Finally, I settled into conservative, Evangelical Christianity, though I have never lost that sense of classical liberal ideals I once had, which now I would identify as Libertarian.
So, the point of all that is to say this.
I would say the two biggest challenges that face Christianity today are atheism and Islam. Today, I am at peace with my own beliefs, and with those that believe differently. It is a forum, by definition, available to all, whether citizens or not, including those who represent them such as the media or organized groups. The state also participates in the public square in its efforts to explain or justify its policies or activities. The place of religion in the public square has generated great controversy. In essence, the debate centers on one fundamental question: in a religiously pluralistic country with a policy of separation between religion and the state, what place should religion have in a forum in which state action is debated, shaped, and, to some extent, implemented?
That is to say, if we accept that the state should not adopt or implement religious positions or policies, to what extent should religious language, concepts or beliefs be used to publicly justify, support or opposed government actions or policies? How do we distinguish between religious advocacy in the public square and state implementation if that occurs? Most people assume that this question raises First Amendment concerns.
Thus, the amendment targets state action, as evidenced by the vast litigation over Establishment and Free Exercise cases. This jurisprudence carefully segregates the state from the public square a domain also protected by the Free Speech clause of the First Amendment in two ways. First, it shields the public square from undue governmental influence.
The government cannot publicly endorse one religion over another, religion over non-religion, nor non-religion over religion. The state cannot justify a law solely on religious ground, nor can it use a law to repress the free exercise rights of a religion. Finally, the government cannot favor or disfavor religion within an open public forum that it creates. Second, the courts have protected the viability of the state and the public domain by assuming a clear distinction between the two and adopting a presumption that state actions are motivated by secular reason absent clear proof to the contrary.
The state is thereby protected against having every justification for public policy offered in the public domain imputed to it, with an obligation to refute or deny those justifications that suggest some form of religious freedom violation. The legal question with respect to individuals or religious groups is similarly clear.
Some of the Most Controversial Issues in Psychology
The state cannot prohibit an individual or groups representing that individual from participating in the public square, supporting or opposing public actions based on 4 religious grounds, or using religious arguments to advance those positions. This is true, even in the case where the individual is a government official, so long as that official is speaking on his or her own behalf. Cognitive behavioural treatment of borderline personality disorder. Segal, Z. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression.
New York: Guildford Press. Ethical Conflicts in Psychology. Washington: American Psychological Association. Howitt, D. Introduction to Forensic and Criminal Psychology. Pearson Education Limited: Essex. Wolber, G. Writing Psychological reports. Professional Resource Press: Florida. Professional Conduct and Discipline in Psychology. Washington: AmericanPsychological Association. Corey, G. Issues and Ethics in the Helping Professions. Feltham, C. Controversies in Psychotherapy and Counselling. London: Sage. Madden, R. Nagy, T. Pope, K. Ethics in Psychotherapy and Counselling.
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Psychopharmacology Bennett, P. Clinical pharmacology. Oxford: Churchill Livingstone. British national formulary. London: Pharmaceutical Press. Neal, M. Medical pharmacology at a glance. New York: Wiley-Blackwell. Nestler E. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill.
Stahl S. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Stephen Attard Maria A. The University makes every effort to ensure that the published Courses Plans, Programmes of Study and Study-Unit information are complete and up-to-date at the time of publication.
Related Controversies in Psychotherapy and Counselling
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved